Mill And Utilitarianism

In to determine whether GM was right in its train to abandon the EV-1 chopine cod to ethical arrangements , it is important to produce the points made by each opposing sidesGM s assembly lineation argues that on the basis of pursuing the superlative non bad(predicate) for the greatest amount , it is due to their moral compact to discontinue the manufacture of the galvanising gondola . According to GM , the EV-1 program does non leap prohibited the affaire of the majority since the ingest for such a fomite was limited . Majority of the market expects for petroleum- found vehicles so producing petroleum- found vehicles is consitent to the have-to doe with of the majorityOn the early(a) hand , the accusative nockrs assert that GM had the ethical obligation to create the make for numerous reasons that will ultimately pencil lead to the greatest good of the greatest number .

This argument is based on the premise that in the absence of a demand for electric car vehicles GM has the capability of creating the demandIn elementary political economy , it is taught that a producer or supplier of a certain good has the ability of creating the demand for a harvest-time In economics , it is referred to as a change in demand This occurs when at that place is a change in the demand for a product as a result of a price thrust (The well-disposed Studies Help Center , 2006Based on this capability , the documentary makers arg ue that GM nookie not evoke the following ! of the greater good in abandoning the EV-1 projectLooking at both arguments to a greater extent closely it appears that both opposing views are trying to stir the other s argument wrong while trying to be consistent with behind Sturat Mill s utileism However , both sides can not be right if they both ground their arguments on Mill s utilitarian place because that would imply that Mill s political theory contradicts itselfBased on the Utilitarian perspective , this author finds more merit in GM s argument that it had the ethical obligation of abandoning the EV-1 program for the rice beer of the greatest good for the greatest number . GM claims that the demands for electric cars are limited - that proves that electric cars do not deliver the greatest good for the greatest number . fifty-fifty if GM had selfish reasons for abandoning the EV-1 program the fact that the demand for electric cars are limited immediately absolves GM ethical obligation to plight the manufacture o f electric carsThe documentray makers argument is not at all in all compelling if based solely on the Utilitarian perspective . John Stuart Mill never said anything nigh manipulating the interest of the majority Utilitarianisms main concern is the greatest pleasure of the greatest number (The cyberspace Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2006 . If the documentary where to make the contention of moral obligation , it should rather be based on Deontological Ethics such as Immanuel Kant s flat ImperativeReferencesThe Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2006 . John Stuart Mill Overview . Retrieved April 8 , 2008 , from The Social Studies Help Center (2006 . Supply...If you want to get a dependable essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay